Marine Utilities

Toukley puts the pump station inland and the intake 1 km offshore

Published 20 July 2026 Editorial responsibility IMWO Region Asia Pacific Confidence Confirmed
Planning-map detail showing the Toukley plant site, underground intake tunnel, Jenny Dixon Beach shaft and intake about 1 km offshore

Central Coast Council; crop of the current preferred project map, not construction evidence

Central Coast Council's current Toukley concept keeps the seawater pump station beside the treatment site and sends a 2.4 km microtunnel to an intake about 1 km off Jenny Dixon Beach. Brine would use the existing Norah Head ocean outfall through a short connection.

What changed

The Planning Portal confirms Prepare EIS, SSI-75724228 and the controlled-action pathway. Council's current page and map establish the preferred inland pump-station and offshore-intake concept. EPBC 2026/10457 supplies the tunnel, caisson and existing-outfall details. These are concept and assessment records; they do not prove funding, tender, award or mobilisation.

Why it matters

The change removes a permanent pump station from the beach reserve, but it does not remove the marine works. Delivery now turns on an intermediate shaft, a long bored route, an offshore caisson and the tunnel-to-intake connection. At the discharge end, using an existing outfall still leaves hydraulic capacity, mixing and plume behaviour to be demonstrated for the combined flow.

Decision read

What remains open

This is a planning baseline, not a construction start. NSW records the project at Prepare EIS and the Commonwealth portal at Assessment Approach Determined. Council is planning an initial 30 ML/d plant within an assessment envelope up to 40 ML/d. No construction funding, detailed-design award, marine contractor or procurement programme is public. The referral's 2036 assumption and early-2040s outlook are scenario dates, not commitments.

Next watchpoints

  • EIS publication and public exhibition
  • Final intake alignment and shaft footprint
  • Marine ground and ecology investigation results
  • Far-field plume modelling and existing-outfall capacity
  • NSW and EPBC approval conditions
  • Detailed-design funding and procurement route
  • Microtunnelling and intake-caisson package awards
  • Hydraulic testing, water-quality trials and environmental acceptance

Knowledge context

Related knowledge topics

Continue through the topic collections to compare this record with related projects, evidence guides, briefs, articles, reports, and performance records.

Sources used 6

Corrections and methodology

Facts are dated to the source record above. IMWO updates the brief when procurement, award, delivery, or scope evidence materially changes.

Review methodology Open intelligence archive Submit a correction