Project record

Toukley desalination intake and existing-outfall connection

Current Toukley planning map showing the plant site, underground seawater intake tunnel, Jenny Dixon Beach shaft and offshore intake location

Central Coast Council; current preferred project map, a planning concept rather than construction evidence

Central Coast Council has settled the current EIS concept for a Toukley desalination plant: the seawater pump station stays beside the existing sewage treatment plant, a 2.4 km microtunnel reaches an intake about 1 km off Jenny Dixon Beach, and a short connection sends brine through the existing Norah Head ocean outfall. NSW lists the project at Prepare EIS. Council has neither decided to build nor funded construction.

Project signal

Planning in Australia

Treat the route and intake geometry as a planning baseline, not a construction package. The current work is concept design and statutory approval for an initial 30 ML/d plant, with an assessment envelope up to 40 ML/d. The EPBC referral, NSW State Significant Infrastructure process and preferred-route map do not establish detailed design, procurement, award, notice to proceed or mobilisation.

Current status Prepare EIS; the current concept fixes a 2.4 km intake tunnel and existing-outfall connection, but no construction decision or funding is public Source confidence Confirmed

Location

Australia / Asia Pacific

Segment

Marine utilities

Status

Prepare EIS; the current concept fixes a 2.4 km intake tunnel and existing-outfall connection, but no construction decision or funding is public / Confirmed

Evidence reviewed

20 July 2026

Controlled taxonomy

Related sectors

The detailed segment above is the primary work classification. These broader sector links connect the project to related delivery and market research.

Knowledge context

Related knowledge topics

Continue through the topic collections to compare this record with related projects, evidence guides, briefs, articles, reports, and performance records.

Project anatomy

Scope, counterparties, and execution logic

Client / authority
Central Coast Council Water and Sewer
Delivery parties
GHD - concept design and statutory approvals support, Construction and marine contractors - not appointed in the cited public record
Contract route
Council appointed GHD to support concept design and statutory approvals. The public record does not identify a funded detailed-design, tunnelling, intake-caisson, process-plant or construction contract. Any later procurement remains conditional on approvals, water-security triggers, funding and a Council decision to proceed.
Execution window
Council is seeking a plan-ready approval rather than an immediate build. The EPBC referral uses 2036 as a conservative planning assumption, says construction could take about 36 months and says the plant may be needed in the early 2040s if drought triggers do not bring it forward. Council's March FAQ uses a broader three-to-four-year construction estimate. Neither is a committed start or completion date.
Works package
The current proposal allows an initial 30 ML/d reverse-osmosis plant and an assessment envelope up to 40 ML/d. Its marine scope includes a roughly 2.4 km, 2.5 m diameter microtunnel from the plant through an intermediate shaft to an intake about 1 km offshore; a roughly 12 m diameter intake tower with concrete caisson rings, a steel support frame, GRP dome, removable grills and rockfill scour protection; and a roughly 180 m brine connection to the Toukley sewage treatment plant outfall tank. A separate 1.4 km, 600 mm treated-water pipeline connects to the potable network.
Marine interfaces
Moving the pump station to the plant site removes the permanent beach pump-station option but concentrates delivery risk in the long microtunnel, the Jenny Dixon Beach construction and maintenance shaft, offshore caisson installation and tunnel-to-intake connection. Brine is proposed to co-mingle with treated effluent through the existing Norah Head ocean outfall, with no physical change to that outfall. Hydraulic capacity, near-field mixing, far-field plume behaviour and discharge approval therefore remain system-level gates rather than assumed benefits of an existing asset.
Commercial read
There is no current marine construction opportunity supported by an owner tender or award. The next market evidence would be an exhibited EIS, approved project description, funded detailed design, geotechnical and marine survey packages, tunnelling or shaft procurement, intake-caisson fabrication and installation, or owner-issued process and integration packages. GHD's planning role should not be read as an EPC or construction award.
Next milestone
Publication and exhibition of the EIS, including the final intake alignment, shaft footprint, marine ecology work, hydraulic and far-field plume modelling, followed by NSW and EPBC determinations. Funding, detailed design and construction procurement would be later and separate gates.

Material change register

What changed, when, and what it proves

Only source-bound events that alter phase, scope, counterparties, delivery, completion, commissioning, or acceptance are listed. A change can advance the record without proving the next gate.

The Commonwealth referral described the offshore intake and existing-outfall connection

EPBC 2026/10457 documented the 2.4 km microtunnel, intake about 1 km offshore, caisson concept and 180 m brine connection. The portal currently records Assessment Approach Determined, not final approval.

Read controlling source

Council fixed the current pump-station and intake-route concept

The preferred concept moved the pump station to the plant site and retained only a construction and maintenance shaft near Jenny Dixon Beach. It defines the EIS basis but does not authorise construction.

Read controlling source

Council opened the next planning and consultation stage

The owner began route and intake option work to make the scheme plan ready for a future drought response. That planning start was not a construction commitment.

Read controlling source

Delivery watch

Evidence needed next

Publication and exhibition of the EIS, including the final intake alignment, shaft footprint, marine ecology work, hydraulic and far-field plume modelling, followed by NSW and EPBC determinations. Funding, detailed design and construction procurement would be later and separate gates.

Decision watchpoints

  • EIS publication, exhibition and final project description
  • NSW and EPBC assessment decisions and approval conditions
  • Intake alignment, intermediate shaft and Jenny Dixon Beach access footprint
  • Marine geotechnical, bathymetric and ecology investigations
  • Far-field brine-plume modelling and existing-outfall hydraulic capacity
  • Detailed-design funding and procurement strategy
  • Microtunnelling, caisson fabrication and offshore installation packages
  • Pressure testing, flushing, water-quality trials and environmental acceptance

Project availability status

This public project page is a tracked market record rather than a tender notice, contractual commitment, or commercial instruction. Use the status, confidence label, evidence-review date, and source note together when judging how much weight to place on the signal.

Read featured analysis Review methodology Submit stronger evidence or a correction Open project tracker

Record control

Evidence reviewed date is not a project-event date.

IMWO changes phase, participants, scope, completion, or acceptance wording only when a dated source establishes the change. The review date records when the evidence set was checked; it does not claim that physical work changed on that date.

Evidence reviewed 20 July 2026 Sources in this record 7

Source record

The NSW Planning Portal controls the Prepare EIS status and SSI-75724228 record. Central Coast Council controls the current preferred concept, 30 ML/d initial capacity, possible 40 ML/d staging and plan-ready purpose. EPBC 2026/10457 supplies the 2.4 km tunnel, 1 km offshore intake, intake-tower concept, 180 m brine connection and existing-outfall boundary. The current map is a planning route, not an as-built alignment. Keep the referral's 36-month estimate separate from Council's three-to-four-year estimate, and keep the 2036 and early-2040s assumptions separate from approved or contracted dates.

Phase: planning. Evidence reviewed: 20 July 2026.

Project sources 7