Global coastal protection monitor

Global Coastal Protection Delivery Monitor: July 2026

Six coastal protection projects across five regions show why delivery cannot be reduced to a single progress percentage. Beach nourishment, island revetments, heritage dikes and walls, deep-water breakwaters, reclamation interfaces and approval-stage defences each depend on different material chains and acceptance evidence.

Public web report / version 1.1 / published 14 July 2026 / data cutoff 16 July 2026.

A bulldozer shapes newly placed sand while a beachfill pipeline discharges material during the 2024 Folly Beach renourishment works

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Charleston District / Dylan Burnell

Evidence scope

Six projects across five regions and distinct coastal delivery methods

Six public IMWO project records in the United States, Liberia, Senegal, Marshall Islands, Italy and India, spanning approval, tender and construction phases across beach nourishment, rubble-mound revetments, dikes and walls, deep-water caisson breakwaters, reclamation and shore protection.

6 tracked projects45 project source citations6 Confirmed records5 world regions

Portfolio composition

Project distribution in this edition

Calculated from 6 public project records in this edition. Counts describe the current portfolio, not market size, expenditure, or completion progress.

Delivery phase

  1. Construction 467%
  2. Approval 117%
  3. Tender 117%

World region

  1. Africa 233%
  2. Americas 117%
  3. Asia Pacific 117%
  4. Europe 117%
  5. Global Islands 117%

Format

Global coastal protection monitor

Audience

Coastal and port owners, marine contractors, dredging and quarry suppliers, designers, lenders, environmental teams, public authorities and institutions comparing current shoreline-protection delivery evidence.

Access

Open web and PDF report. No registration or access request is required.

Download report PDF

Evidence table

Download the fixed project evidence set used for this edition, including phase, confidence, update date, and primary source fields.

Download report CSV

Publication record

A stable edition with a visible revision trail.

International Marine Work Organization (2026). Global Coastal Protection Delivery Monitor: July 2026 (Version 1.1, IMWO-REP-2026-07-COASTAL; data cutoff 16 July 2026). https://imwo.org/reports/report-global-coastal-protection-delivery-monitor

Edition identifier
IMWO-REP-2026-07-COASTAL
Current revision
Version 1.1 / updated 16 July 2026. Ocean City now carries a five-event, six-source history rather than only the current contract snapshot. The update keeps completed cycles outside current production, preserves the anti-double-counting rule and reconciles 45 citations across the six linked projects.
Review cycle
Monthly evidence review; material award, mobilisation, completion, acceptance or project-scope changes can trigger an interim dated revision.
Correction route
Submit stronger primary evidence or a documented correction for review in the next dated revision.

Calculated snapshot

What the included records show

Every count uses the same six-record denominator at the stated cutoff. The figures describe evidence maturity, region and phase within the included set; they are not market shares, forecasts, capacity measures or estimates of protection performance.

Tracked projects 6

All six records satisfy the named-project, physical-interface, structured-source and anti-double-counting rules.

6 of 6 included records
Construction-stage records 4

Ocean City, Ebeye, Gorée and Genoa have current construction evidence, while West Point is at approval and Vadhvan at tender.

4 of 6 included records
Approval or tender stage 2

West Point has an environmental permit without public award or mobilisation evidence; Vadhvan has separate awarded and unawarded package states.

2 of 6 included records
World regions 5

The set covers Africa, the Americas, Asia Pacific, Europe and Global islands, with two distinct African project records.

5 region labels across 6 included records

Executive findings

The six coastal projects differ in material route, workability window and acceptance method, so shoreline length alone is not a meaningful delivery comparison.

Finding 01

Material arrival is not coastal protection acceptance

Ocean City's current contract quantity begins at an offshore borrow site, while its separate 2022-23 placed quantity and stockpile are historical results. Ebeye's armourstone begins at a Ras Al Khaimah quarry and crosses an ocean before barge transfer. In both projects, material produced, shipped, landed or pumped remains different from surveyed, compliant and owner-accepted protection geometry.

Finding 02

Preconstruction evidence has its own commercial value

West Point has project finance, met-ocean work, an approved ESIA and a March 2026 environmental permit, but the reviewed public record does not identify a works contractor or notice to proceed. Procurement and mobilisation are now the material events; another statement that the project exists would not change its status.

Finding 03

Port interfaces need package-level boundaries

Genoa and Vadhvan both contain major breakwater and seabed interfaces, yet their evidence states differ sharply. Genoa has installed caissons and active foundation work; Vadhvan has an awarded nearshore package while the offshore breakwater and dredging-reclamation packages remain separate procurement questions.

Finding 04

Workability can change the finance and schedule path

Gorée's extension request ties delay and cost pressure to sea conditions, supply constraints, inflation and heritage-specific design adjustments. Ebeye adds long-haul rock logistics and transfer conditions, while Ocean City works inside a compressed seasonal beach and environmental window. Published end dates therefore need method-specific evidence.

Finding 05

Completion claims require different measurements

A nourishment contract closes through placed volume and surveyed berm geometry; revetments require toe, filter and armour acceptance; caisson breakwaters require foundation, continuity and navigation interfaces; reclamation requires settlement, perimeter protection and hydrographic proof. One generic percentage-complete field cannot safely compare the set.

Included project evidence

Six Confirmed public project records form the denominator for this edition. Each project page carries the current scope, delivery parties, commercial boundary, next milestone, visual context and complete source list.

United States / Confirmed

Ocean City and Peck Beach 2026 Periodic Nourishment

Coastal infrastructure / Construction

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock's USD 19.5 million nourishment contract is in construction; dredge mobilisation is evidenced, but placed volume, accepted beach template and completion remain open

6 structured project sources
Liberia / Confirmed

West Point Coastal Defence Revetment

Coastal infrastructure / Approval

The West Point revetment has an approved ESIA and March 2026 environmental permit; construction award, notice to proceed and physical start are not established

5 structured project sources
Marshall Islands / Confirmed

Ebeye Coastal Protection Works

Coastal infrastructure / Construction

Marine logistics and construction are established; completion and owner acceptance are not confirmed, while the latest programme update forecasts completion by the end of 2026

7 structured project sources
Italy / Confirmed

Genoa New Breakwater

Ports and coastal protection / Construction

24 caissons installed and the first kilometre passed; seabed foundation, superstructure, dredging, and navigation-opening gates remain active

10 structured project sources
India / Confirmed

Vadhvan Greenfield Deep-draft Port

Deep-water ports, dredging and reclamation / Tender

The approximately 200-hectare nearshore reclamation and shore-protection EPC package is awarded; as of 15 July 2026, the owner tender page lists the offshore dredging, reclamation and protection-bund HAM package closing on 17 July and the Daman marine-sand investigation closing on 15 July, while no award or AOC is published for either package or for the 10.14-kilometre offshore breakwater

11 structured project sources

Inside this report

  1. Evidence set, anti-double-counting rule, regional spread, phase treatment and confidence boundary
  2. Material chains from offshore sand borrow and pipeline pump-out to quarry grading, ocean carriage, transfer barges, reclamation and caisson foundations
  3. Workability and interface controls across exposed islands, heritage shorelines, active ports, urban settlements and public beaches
  4. Commercial and acceptance gates from environmental permit and award through mobilisation, surveyed geometry, completion, handover and post-storm performance

Method

How the snapshot was calculated

The July edition follows six public IMWO records with identifiable coastal protection scope and current delivery evidence at the 16 July 2026 cutoff. Qualification depends on a named package, a physical shoreline, breakwater, nourishment, revetment, dike, wall, reclamation or marine-material interface, and structured support from an accountable source. One project contributes one latest evidenced phase. The WACA ResIP 1 regional programme is excluded from the denominator because the included Gorée project is one of its country work fronts; counting both would duplicate the same physical package. Vadhvan is included as a bounded port-coastal interface and remains at tender because its nearshore shore-protection package is awarded while the defining offshore breakwater and dredging-reclamation packages remain without official award evidence in the reviewed record. Ocean City's formal programme baseline, completed 2022-23 cycle and active 2026 contract are retained as separate dated layers so historical placed quantities cannot enter the current production ledger.

Data cutoff
16 July 2026
Denominator
6 public coastal protection delivery records across five regions.
Confidence rule
Only Confirmed project records are included. Programme-level records that duplicate an included country package and signals without a defined physical interface are excluded.
Limitations
This six-project set cannot represent global coastal-protection expenditure, shoreline exposure, avoided losses, nourishment volume, quarry demand or contractor backlog. Nor are its acceptance measures interchangeable: delivered rock is not installed armour, dredged sand is not an accepted beach template, an environmental permit is not notice to proceed, and a caisson count is not an open navigation channel. Quantities, schedules and designs may change after the cutoff.

Sources used 10

Knowledge context

Related knowledge topics

Continue through the topic collections to compare this record with related projects, evidence guides, briefs, articles, reports, and performance records.

Continue through the evidence base

This report is a dated research snapshot, not an investment forecast, procurement recommendation, legal opinion, or delivery commitment. Review the linked project records and current briefings before acting on any individual project signal.

Open project tracker Read current intelligence Review methodology