Contract Boundaries

Saint-Malo's visible demolition still leaves four contract ledgers apart

Published 2 August 2026 Publisher IMWO Region Europe Confidence Confirmed
Aerial view of Saint-Malo Terminal du Naye, its lock, ferry berths, outer-harbour approaches and adjoining marina

Ports de Bretagne - Région Bretagne; exact Terminal du Naye site context

The old Ro-Ro ramp is gone and one lock-guide structure is under demolition, but the public numbers describe four different layers: Lot 2, the whole terminal programme, the first 2025 dredging campaign and the wider environmental authorisation.

An award has become a physical marine construction record

TED controls the Lot 2 award, winner group, value and contract date. Région Bretagne controls programme budgets, phase sequencing, the separate first dredging campaign and environmental authorisation. Ports de Bretagne controls the current ramp-removal and lock-guide demolition record. The measured Lot 2 dredging volume, post-dredge survey, complete subcontract chain, accepted caisson installation and final account remain unpublished.

Four ledgers, one terminal

TED identifies the EUR 23.59496167 million contractor group, while owner updates identify the ramp removal, active demolition, engineering and environmental teams, equipment and reuse route. That closes the award-to-mobilisation gap. It does not turn every Terminal du Naye quantity or budget into a Lot 2 commercial metric.

Evidence conclusion

Lot 2 quantities remain unreported

Outstanding evidence

  • Measured maintenance-dredging quantity under Lot 2
  • Replacement-caisson fabrication, launch and immersion
  • Completion of both lock-guide demolitions
  • Hydrographic acceptance and operating-clearance evidence
  • Named lower-tier dredging, survey, lifting and caisson suppliers
  • Material-reuse ledger and no-sea-disposal close-out
  • Owner completion certificate and final account

Subject index

Related subjects

These subject pages bring together related projects, technical articles, reports, and evidence methods.

Sources used 7

Source collections