IMWO Awards

Five awards for the work that shapes marine infrastructure.

The inaugural categories distinguish completed delivery, operating performance, specialist technical contributions, resilience outcomes, and knowledge that changes professional practice. An entry follows the achievement being put forward, not the size, value, or profile of the wider project.

Current cycle

The inaugural cycle is not open.

The category definitions below are established. Dates, the eligible period, entry route, active categories, and jury appointments take effect together through the dated call recorded on the cycle page.

Read eligibility rules Current cycle

Project

Marine Works Project Award

For a completed or accepted marine works project that demonstrates strong engineering, controlled execution, and a clearly evidenced delivery result.

Who may enter: owners, public authorities, developers, designers, contractors, joint ventures, and integrated project teams.

Typical subjects: berths and quay walls, breakwaters, navigation dredging, reclamation, terminals, shore protection, marine intakes and outfalls, and subsea crossings.

The record should show: the accepted scope or phase, site constraints, delivery responsibility, marine logistics, temporary works, changes, tests, surveys, and close-out result.

Not enough on its own: a contract award, construction start, progress percentage, or planned completion date.

Asset

Marine Asset Performance Award

For a marine or waterfront asset with an operating record that demonstrates reliable function, capacity, maintainability, or service improvement.

Who may enter: owners, operators, developers, port authorities, utilities, concessionaires, and public clients.

Typical subjects: navigation channels and port basins, berths, breakwaters, mooring systems, ferry landings, terminal marine systems, and water or wastewater marine assets.

The record should show: accepted configuration, operating baseline, observation period, demand or exposure, availability, downtime, maintenance interventions, exclusions, and sustained result.

Not enough on its own: design capacity, commissioning output, or one operating milestone without a defined observation period.

Engineering

Specialist Marine Engineering Award

For a distinctive engineering or installation contribution in dredging, geotechnics, mooring, marine structures, subsea utilities, heavy lift, or related specialist work.

Who may enter: specialist contractors, designers, suppliers, researchers, and integrated delivery teams.

Typical subjects: dredging methods, ground treatment, marine foundations, caisson or immersed-element installation, shore pulls, mooring design, temporary marine works, and heavy lifts.

The record should show: the technical problem, alternatives considered, design basis, interfaces, temporary states, execution method, hold points, verification, and the entrant's precise responsibility.

Not enough on its own: participation in a prominent project without isolating the specialist decision, method, or verified installation result.

Resilience

Coastal and Waterfront Resilience Award

For work that reduces coastal or waterfront risk and demonstrates performance across hazard, structural response, consequence, recovery, or adaptation.

Who may enter: public clients, owners, communities, consultants, contractors, developers, and operators.

Typical subjects: beach nourishment, revetments and seawalls, flood barriers, breakwater adaptation, dunes, wetlands, habitat structures, and recovery-led waterfront reconstruction.

The record should show: baseline hazard and consequence, design loading, residual risk, monitoring period or observed event response, maintenance, limitations, and outcomes for the asset or community.

Not enough on its own: projected benefit, permitted scope, or modelled performance presented as though it were an observed outcome.

Knowledge

Marine Works Knowledge Award

For a method, standard, dataset, investigation, or documented operating lesson that materially improves professional marine works practice.

Who may enter: researchers, practitioners, owners, operators, project teams, standards bodies, academic institutions, and technical publishers.

Typical subjects: design guidance, standards, field datasets, investigation methods, monitoring protocols, construction lessons, and operating practices with demonstrated use.

The record should show: authorship, purpose, method, data provenance, validation, reproducibility, use, limitations, access conditions, and independent review or adoption.

Not enough on its own: a promotional publication, undocumented opinion, or claim that cannot be independently examined.

Choose the award that matches the achievement.

One project may produce several distinct achievements over time, but an entry must make one principal case. Separate entries need genuinely different scopes, responsible parties, outcomes, and reasons for recognition.

Entry requirements

Assessment basis

Each award is judged on the evidence appropriate to it.

Every entry is assessed on a common 0-to-5 scale and the same evidence standard. The weighted criteria differ because a completed project, an operating asset, and a professional knowledge contribution do not establish merit in the same way.

Project
Engineering, delivery control, accepted outcome, responsibility, and learning.
Asset
Operating performance, measurement quality, maintainability, resilience, and user value.
Engineering
Technical contribution, execution control, verification, responsibility, and learning.
Resilience
Hazard baseline, technical response, observed performance, residual risk, and adaptation.
Knowledge
Professional value, method integrity, originality, demonstrated use, and accessibility.

Award citations will name the contribution and the evidence.

A category does not have to produce a recipient. The jury may make no award where eligible entries do not meet the evidence and quality threshold stated in the dated call. Any recipient record will identify the recognised contribution without implying certification of the whole project, asset, organization, or supply chain.

Evaluation framework Evidence standard