The 2002 Duke Marine Lab project replaced a hardened shoreline with sand fill, marsh vegetation and an 80 m granite sill. NOAA's monitoring summary reports stable stonework but marsh-zone elevation gains below local sea-level rise. Future maintenance depends on both structural condition and position in the tidal frame.
Photo credit: Duke Marine Lab shortly after construction and planting; restoration completed in 2002, exact photograph date unspecified.
Source: NOAA NCCOS, Site Report: Duke Marine Lab, Figure 2 (p. 2). Historical photograph shortly after construction and planting; restoration completed in 2002, exact photo date unspecified. NOAA NCCOS (institutional source) / Original source. NOAA material reuse and credit conditions: NOAA source-use policy.
Changes: JPEG re-encoding; full embedded-image frame, 1239 x 665.
Retain NOAA and source-report credit with the stated image changes. Reuse must preserve the source context and avoid implying government endorsement or affiliation.
This notice covers this photograph and the stated image changes only; article text and other site content are excluded.
Living shoreline sill and intertidal marsh is the primary work classification. Related sectors connect this record to adjacent marine delivery and market coverage.
Subject index
Related subjects
These subject pages bring together related projects, technical articles, reports, and evidence methods.
Project anatomy
Contract scope and delivery roles
Client / authority
Duke University Marine Lab and North Carolina Coastal Federation; original restoration funded by NOAA's Community Based Restoration Program
Delivery parties
Construction contractor unspecified in the cited NOAA site report.
Contract route
Historical collaborative restoration supported by NOAA funding. Current works participation is unassessed.
Execution window
Original restoration completed in 2002. Surface elevation table observations began in 2004 and vegetation observations in 2008. NOAA's archive-page span is 12 October 2004-10 April 2025. The site report compares original and 2025 sill surveys; its marsh and sea-level averages cover 2004-24.
Works package
Removal of the previous seawall and cement fish pens; placement of clean sand fill graded to 8%; construction of an 80 m granite sill and an approximately 2 ft sand berm at the upland transition; low- and high-marsh planting. Two 6 ft sill depressions, approximately 1 ft below the other crest sections, provide fish access in NOAA's site description.
Marine interfaces
The western Pivers Island shoreline lies in a small basin, with maximum fetch reported below 1 km and average waves of 10-15 cm. The sill crest and lowered sections affect inundation and habitat access. NOAA reports wave attenuation of 45% on average and 88% at maximum from gauges on either side of the sill.
Commercial evidence boundary
Stable stonework and declining marsh elevation relative to water lead to different maintenance scopes. Common-datum crest and marsh surveys help the owner distinguish structural repair from intervention in the marsh or sill level. Current repair budget, contract and payment terms are unknown.
Evidence gap
What remains unverified
Outstanding evidence
Current common-datum crest, marsh-zone and local water-level surveys
Performance thresholds and any issued maintenance design
Water exchange and habitat effects of changes to the sill or marsh level